- Sharing information with arbitrators on recent decision quality trends and drivers.
 - Answering questions arbitrators may have on hearing cases.
 
Invoices, Photos, and Proving Damages
- Rule 3-6 notes that hearings are informal.
 - Arbitrators are to accept any and all listed evidence as outlined under Rule 3-6. This excludes links to evidence to outside website sources or audio of a recorded statement taken by a claim’s professional, etc.
 - AF does not have a rule stating invoices and photos are not required to prove damages.
 - Invoices and photos may be needed if there is no other evidence to support and explain the damages or repair amount.
 
- Address the evidence that supports the party’s argument.
 - Explain how and which evidence supports the loss theory, damages sought, or the damage dispute.
 - Do not use templates or generic language.
 - Do not raise issues not argued by the parties or that are not supported by the evidence.
 
- Payments made toward additional exposures can show as issued and not paid.
 - Regardless of where it is attached, all evidence must be considered. There are three exceptions:
	
- Damage evidence in the Auto forum must be attached to the damages section.
 - In a deferment hearing, the only evidence an arbitrator can view is evidence the members have attached to the deferment section.
 - When a jurisdictional exclusion or affirmative pleading is raised, Rule 2-4 states the parties must raise and support pleadings or jurisdictional exclusions where provided.
 
 - A screenshot of the responding company’s policy limit is adequate to prove the limit.
 - Avoid using “per AF” or “AF does not require” language.
 - Rebuttal evidence is allowed if it is attached directly to refute the responding company’s damage dispute. 
	
- Evidence must be submitted with the initial filing to support the amount sought.
 - Acceptable rebuttal evidence includes the following: 
		
- An estimate proving a vehicle is a total loss
 - An invoice that provides a breakdown of the storage damages
 - Photos that illustrate the vehicle’s pre-loss condition
 
 
 - Embedded evidence comments must summarize the evidence contents.
 - Acceptance of liability in E-Subro Hub 
	
- There are no formal rules in E-Subro Hub.
 - It is a different product from TRS arbitration.
 - If the responding company is now disputing liability, typically, they will need to explain why the offer is being rescinded (i.e., new evidence).
 - As with any prior settlement offer, it is at the arbitrator’s discretion to determine if it applies to the arbitration filing.
 
 - As noted under Article Fifth, AF makes and interprets the rules.